Gwydir Shire Council
Budget & finances

Budget & finances

Comparing raw dollar totals between councils isn't very useful — bigger councils naturally have bigger numbers. What does tell you about a council's financial health are normalised indicators: the standard ratios that every NSW council reports against the Office of Local Government's benchmarks, plus per-property figures you can compare to the NSW average. The ratios below are from the NSW Government's 'Your Council' / OLG time-series data for 2023–24. (The OLG classifies Gwydir as a Large Rural council, so it is benchmarked at under 10% for rates outstanding; metropolitan councils are held to under 5%.) Two rows need reading carefully rather than at a glance, and both are explained under the table: the asset maintenance ratio and the buildings-and-infrastructure renewals ratio.

New to these terms? Read them in plain English
Operating performance ratio
Whether everyday income covers everyday running costs.
Own-source operating revenue ratio
How much of the council's income it raises itself vs. grants from other governments.
Unrestricted current ratio
Whether the council has enough spare cash to pay its short-term bills.
Debt service cover ratio
How comfortably operating cash covers the council's loan repayments.
Rates & annual charges outstanding ratio
The share of rates bills that haven't been paid by year-end.
Cash expense cover ratio
How many months the council could keep paying bills if income stopped.
Infrastructure backlog ratio
The cost of fixing run-down assets, as a share of what those assets are worth.
Asset maintenance ratio
Whether the council actually spends what it should on maintaining its assets.
Building & infrastructure renewals ratio
Whether assets are being renewed as fast as they wear out.
Operating result (surplus / deficit)
Income minus expenses for the year's normal operations.
OLG benchmark
The healthy target set by the state for each financial ratio.
Average residential rate
The typical yearly general-rates bill for a home in the area.
Office of Local Government (OLG)
The NSW body overseeing councils; publishes the financial data.
See the full explainer, with formulas →

The numbers

$825 / yearAbout 31% below the NSW council average of ~$1,203 (2023–24 was $799, vs NSW ~$1,140). A low average residential rate mainly reflects local land values and the council's rating structure — in Gwydir 80% of the general rate yield is budgeted to come from the Farmland category and 16% from Residential — and is not a measure of service levels either way. Separate charges apply for waste, water, sewer and stormwater. (OLG time-series data.)
Operating performance ratio −0.9%Just below the >0% benchmark — close to breaking even, but a deficit. In 2024–25 the audited accounts show total income of $59.6M and a net operating result of +$7.9M, which becomes −$11.3M once grants and contributions for capital purposes are excluded.
Liquidity & cash
Unrestricted current ratio 3.14×, debt service cover 5.61×, 9.7 months cash — all passAll three liquidity and debt measures are comfortably above their benchmarks (>1.5×, >2× and >3 months).
Self-funding
Own-source revenue 44.2% (misses)Below the >60% benchmark: like most small rural NSW councils, Gwydir draws a majority of its income from grants and contributions rather than rates, charges and fees.
100.0% against a benchmark of "greater than 100%"Not a shortfall. The audited Report on Infrastructure Assets shows actual asset maintenance of $12.034M against required asset maintenance of $12.034M for 2024–25 — the council spent exactly what it assessed as required, so the ratio lands precisely on the threshold. Because the benchmark is strictly greater than 100%, it is scored 'No' in the table below, but nothing is under-spent. The same 100.0% figure is reported for 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25.
Renewals — a large year-on-year movement
70.8% (2023–24) → 14.9% (2024–25)Both are published, audited figures: asset renewals of $1.535M against depreciation, amortisation and impairment of $10.267M in 2024–25. The benchmark is >100%. We show both years rather than averaging them or picking one; neither the council's Annual Report 2024–25 nor its published planning documents give a reason for the movement, and we do not speculate about one. The comparable 2022–23 figure was 44.5%.
1.01%Passes the <2% benchmark, as it did in 2023–24 (0.39%) and 2022–23 (0.32%). The estimated cost to bring assets to a satisfactory standard was $6.369M against a net carrying amount of $631.7M.
7.4%Below the under-10% benchmark that applies to rural councils.
Indicator (2023–24)GwydirMeets?
−0.9%> 0%No
44.2%> 60%No
3.14×> 1.5×Yes
5.61×> 2×Yes
7.4%< 10%Yes
9.7 months> 3 monthsYes
0.4%< 2%Yes
100.0% — exactly on the line, not below it> 100%No
70.8% (2024–25: 14.9%)> 100%No

Gwydir's financial-health indicators, 2023–24, against the NSW Office of Local Government benchmarks. 'Meets?' simply states whether the figure is on the benchmark side of the line. Source: NSW Government 'Your Council' / OLG time-series data, 2023–24.

These ratios are the standard, size-independent way to read a council's finances, which is why we use them instead of raw dollar totals. Gwydir met 5 of the 9 benchmarks in 2023–24. Two rows deserve a plain-English gloss. The asset maintenance ratio is 100.0% — exactly the threshold, not below it: the audited statements record actual maintenance of $12.034M against required maintenance of $12.034M, so the 'No' is an artefact of a benchmark written as strictly greater than 100%, and the same figure appears in 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25. The buildings-and-infrastructure renewals ratio moved a long way between years — 44.5% in 2022–23, 70.8% in 2023–24 and 14.9% in 2024–25 — and we publish both recent years, labelled, rather than averaging them or choosing the flattering one; the council's Annual Report does not explain the movement, so neither do we. Liquidity, cash cover and debt service cover are all well clear of their benchmarks, while own-source revenue is well below, which is common for small rural councils that depend heavily on grants. We present the numbers and their benchmarks; whether that's good value is for you to judge from the sources below.

Sources — check it yourself

Figures are current as at the dates shown and may change — always confirm with the linked source. See the notice at the bottom of the page for full details and how to report a correction.