Clarence Valley Council
Budget & finances

Budget & finances

Comparing raw dollar totals between councils isn't very useful — bigger councils naturally have bigger numbers. What does tell you about a council's financial health are normalised indicators: the standard ratios that every NSW council reports against the Office of Local Government's benchmarks, plus per-property figures you can compare to the NSW average. The ratios below are from the NSW Government's 'Your Council' / OLG time-series data for 2023–24.

New to these terms? Read them in plain English
Operating performance ratio
Whether everyday income covers everyday running costs.
Own-source operating revenue ratio
How much of the council's income it raises itself vs. grants from other governments.
Unrestricted current ratio
Whether the council has enough spare cash to pay its short-term bills.
Debt service cover ratio
How comfortably operating cash covers the council's loan repayments.
Rates & annual charges outstanding ratio
The share of rates bills that haven't been paid by year-end.
Cash expense cover ratio
How many months the council could keep paying bills if income stopped.
Infrastructure backlog ratio
The cost of fixing run-down assets, as a share of what those assets are worth.
Asset maintenance ratio
Whether the council actually spends what it should on maintaining its assets.
Building & infrastructure renewals ratio
Whether assets are being renewed as fast as they wear out.
Operating result (surplus / deficit)
Income minus expenses for the year's normal operations.
OLG benchmark
The healthy target set by the state for each financial ratio.
Average residential rate
The typical yearly general-rates bill for a home in the area.
Office of Local Government (OLG)
The NSW body overseeing councils; publishes the financial data.
See the full explainer, with formulas →
$1,380 / yearAbout 15% above the NSW council average of ~$1,203. In 2023–24 it was $1,340 (NSW ~$1,140). A separate domestic waste charge (~$371 in 2024–25) applies. (OLG 'Your Council' data.)
Operating deficit — performance ratio −12.1%Below the >0% benchmark; one of the stand-out misses this year.
Infrastructure
Backlog 36.5% (well above the <2% benchmark); renewals 180.9% (passes); maintenance 65.7% (misses)The infrastructure-backlog ratio — the value of works needed to bring assets to a satisfactory standard — is very high against the OLG's <2% benchmark; the OLG's 2024–25 time-series shows 34.9%.
Self-funding
Own-source revenue 55.6% (misses)Below the >60% benchmark — the council relies more on grants and contributions than the benchmark assumes.
Liquidity & cash
Unrestricted current ratio 3.48×, 20.1 months cash, debt service cover 3.39× (all pass)Liquidity, cash buffer and debt-service cover are all above benchmark.
7.3%Below the <10% benchmark that applies to regional councils.
Indicator (2023–24)Clarence ValleyMeets?
−12.1%> 0%No
55.6%> 60%No
3.48×> 1.5×Yes
3.39×> 2×Yes
7.3%< 10%Yes
20.1 months> 3 monthsYes
36.5%< 2%No
65.7%> 100%No
180.9%> 100%Yes

Clarence Valley Council's financial-health indicators, 2023–24, against the NSW Office of Local Government benchmarks. 'Meets?' simply states whether the figure is on the benchmark side of the line. Source: NSW Government 'Your Council' / OLG time-series data, 2023–24.

These ratios are the standard, size-independent way to read a council's finances, which is why we use them instead of raw dollar totals. Clarence Valley met 5 of the 9 benchmarks in 2023–24. The two stand-out misses are the operating result (a −12.1% operating deficit against a >0% benchmark) and the infrastructure backlog (36.5% against a <2% benchmark — the value of works needed to bring assets up to a satisfactory standard, which is very high). The OLG classifies Clarence Valley as a regional council, so it is benchmarked at under 10% for rates outstanding (metropolitan councils are benchmarked at under 5%). The OLG's 2024–25 time-series shows the infrastructure ratios moving slightly: backlog 34.9%, maintenance 67.7%, renewals 105.5%. We present the numbers and their benchmarks; whether that's good value is for you to judge from the sources below.

Sources — check it yourself

Figures are current as at the dates shown and may change — always confirm with the linked source. See the notice at the bottom of the page for full details and how to report a correction.